The Camaro Club (UK)

Online Community for all Camaro Owners and enthusiasts
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 3:40 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [13 posts ]  Go to pagePrevious12
Author Message
PostPosted:Mon Mar 02, 2015 11:57 am 
Offline
Big Block
User avatar

Joined:Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:35 am
Posts:2566
Car Details:79' camaro road & track day toy. 383 stroker, 5 speed TKO trans, lots of suspension stuff, 13" Vette brakes, 18" wheels.
Location:Luton
Looking good.. I'd be careful about going any lower without very careful measuring, and standard spring rates...

My tyres sits just in line, or even below the wheel arch, and it's too low really. It rubs the sway bar a little on full lock, but doesn't hit the arch lip or the wheel well because I have virtually zero deflection due to solid bushes, high spring rate and lots of camber, but I'd prefer it an inch higher in reality.

Image

_________________
“You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.”


Top
   

Re: Lowering the Ride Hieght

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

PostPosted:Mon Mar 02, 2015 4:40 pm 
Offline
Big Block
User avatar

Joined:Sun Jan 13, 2013 7:00 am
Posts:1158
Car Details:1986 Camaro, bought into Spain by me in 1993.
305 replaced by a 355, 750 Demon carb, RPM AirGap intake, Brodix heads, Hedman Hedders, 3" Flowmaster exhaust.
Wheels are Summit aluminium 5 spokes, tyres are 245 rear 225 front BF Goodrich.
B/M transmission, battery relocated to the rear, GoodMark 4" cowl steel hood.
Location:Spain East Coast
It's a pain to do but I thought after cutting 1/2 - 1 coil you had to drive the car and let it settle.
Then, if necessary cut more, 1/2 at a time.

I lowered mine with Hotchkiss springs, then I removed the iron heads for aluminium, iron water pump for aluminium,
air conditioning all gone, all the wiring for the electronic QJet was gone.........in the end the front has risen up. :lolno:
But I won´t lower it any more due to ground clearance issues, especially the spoiler.


Top
   
PostPosted:Mon Mar 02, 2015 6:00 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Thu Jul 21, 2011 2:16 pm
Posts:815
Car Details:1980 2nd Gen, 6.0 iron block LS, 4.11 12 bolt axle, Brute Strength Posi, Lowered 2", sub frame connectors, G-braces, Carbon hood and front bumper cover
Location:Norfolk
It's just my opinion but you really ought to consider taller rubber. I think they look a bit silly when the arches aren't filled properly, the wheels just look lost in there, you'd have to lower it more than practical to make it 'look' right. The pic below is mine with 17" rims. The stock tyres fitted to the second gen were 205/75/15 which are 27" tall.

255/55/17 rear and 225/55/17 fronts.

My ride height is just over 1" lower than stock

Image

_________________
My '80 progress thread - hugger orange! Now with LQ9 power - forged pistons, LS2 rods, 236/242, .621/.612, flowed and milled 317 heads. MS3X

4L80e, 12 bolt, 4.11, Moroso brute strength posi, steel shafts.

Subframe connectors, g-braces, solid body bushes, carbon hood and front bumper, custom door cards, Autometer gauges.


Top
   
Display posts from previous: Sort by 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [13 posts ]  Go to pagePrevious12

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited