The Camaro Club (UK)

Online Community for all Camaro Owners and enthusiasts
It is currently Fri Nov 01, 2024 9:32 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [14 posts ]  Go to page12Next
Author Message
PostPosted:Sun Nov 17, 2013 5:31 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:36 pm
Posts:81
Car Details:1969 Chevrolet Camaro
Hey, can anyone help with a street setup for my 1969 Camaro? I’ve searched the internet and forums and found a few setups but with conflicting information (here’s one I bookmarked http://www.superchevy.com/technical/cha ... nt_basics/)

I’ve just changed my front tyres as the edges were scrubbed off, I’m running a cpp big block suspension kit up front including drop spindles, 215/45/17 tyres up front and I plan on changing the upper and lower ball joints and outer tie rod ends and a set of these to lift the front about 1" http://www.rickscamaros.com/camaro-coil ... -1981.html

So first question
[*] would I benefit from fitting the 'tall' tie rod ends and upper ball joints? Or just the normal spec ones?

And
[*] what would be a good wheel alignment spec for my car to stop it eating tyres for fun and drive well on the street? I can’t fault the drive as it is now it’s just the scrubbing of the tyres.
When the suspension kit was fitted about 4 year ago by the previous owner it was set to 3+ caster and ¾- camber, 1/8 toe in
ImageImageImageImageImageImage


Top
   

Definative 1st Gen camaro wheel alignment specs.

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

PostPosted:Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
Big Block
User avatar

Joined:Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:41 am
Posts:827
Car Details:1968 Camaro Racing Car "Butch"
1968 Camaro Convertible 327"Camilla"
1979 AMC CJ7 Jeep 360V8
1980 BMW E21 Alpina B6 2.8
1991 BMW E30 HartgeH26
1958 as yet unrevealed sportsracer with chevV8
Location:Isle of Man and Inverness
key is to ensure that bottom wishbone is parallel to ground
info here:

Suspension settings non Global West negative Roll for full race
TCB Martin Thomas notes
Camber degrees -3 -3 as much neg as possible
Caster degrees 3 3 no more than 4.5
toe in 15 mins in 20 mins in
toe total 30 mins
Frt Spring Rate 650 lbs 800lbs
rear spring rate 150 lbs CF Bedford van springs

Type caster caster camber camber toe total
GW Settings L R L R
Street Performance 2 2 1/2 - 1/2 - 1/2 3/32
Hard street 2 2 1/2 -1 -1 3/32
Road racing 3 3 -1 3/4 -1 3/4 1/16
Drag Racing 3 3 0 0 1/32
All measurements taken with driver weight added
If vehicle has a lot of rack get as much caster available as long as camber is zero.
caster and camber are measured in degrees toe in minutes

_________________
Kind Regards
TopCat
Secretary
Classic Camaro Club
Member of The Association of American Car Clubs UK
Email :tboles@strathnoon.co.uk Websites: http://www.classiccamaroclubuk.com and:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdhLJtR_ZY4


Top
   
PostPosted:Mon Nov 18, 2013 12:33 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:36 pm
Posts:81
Car Details:1969 Chevrolet Camaro
So for normal street driving - drivers side caster +2.2 passenger side caster 1/2, both sides 1/2 camber and total toe in 3\32? Is this took into consideration about a 2" drop and wider radial tyres? What do you think about the tall ball joints and tie rod ends are they worth getting or not?


Top
   
PostPosted:Tue Nov 19, 2013 6:41 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts:160
Car Details:80 T/A with a BBC
79 Z28
68 Firebird F 400
67 Firebird Convertible
Location:Penzance, Cornwall
Those springs are to short and I dont think that spacer will fix your problem , with the angles you have shown you must be getting bump steer which may cause the uneven tyre ware or just under inflation?

Looking at the pic with the lower balljoint and disc I dont think the taller joint is an option as the arm will touch the disc I think?

I would not worry about caster and camber at the moment as with it set like it is it will be altering more than normal with every bump and movement.

Try to get your ride hight (as in the lower arm parallel to the road) and then set it up as to how you like it to drive ie I like to feel my steering pull back to straight after cornering and not wallow down the road following white lines, road works, etc. so I set up with more castor to help it centralise better.


Top
   
PostPosted:Tue Nov 19, 2013 9:42 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:36 pm
Posts:81
Car Details:1969 Chevrolet Camaro
Quote:
Those springs are to short and I dont think that spacer will fix your problem , with the angles you have shown you must be getting bump steer which may cause the uneven tyre ware or just under inflation?

Looking at the pic with the lower balljoint and disc I dont think the taller joint is an option as the arm will touch the disc I think?

I would not worry about caster and camber at the moment as with it set like it is it will be altering more than normal with every bump and movement.

Try to get your ride height (as in the lower arm parallel to the road) and then set it up as to how you like it to drive ie I like to feel my steering pull back to straight after cornering and not wallow down the road following white lines, road works, etc. so I set up with more castor to help it centralise better.
would fitting a stock height spring be best then? to make it sit level, its supposed to have had a 2" drop in the rear as well, do they look like drop spindles or stock? because if its had drop spindles and a 1" drop spring as well that is probably why its scrubbing and eating ball joints, i cant fault the way it drives its just the wear and damage to suspension and tyres

Image


Top
   
PostPosted:Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:30 am 
Offline
Big Block
User avatar

Joined:Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:49 pm
Posts:500
Car Details:a car thats older than the c*** that drives it....
Location:n london/ herts
that is a fine lookin car :thumbup:


Top
   
PostPosted:Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts:160
Car Details:80 T/A with a BBC
79 Z28
68 Firebird F 400
67 Firebird Convertible
Location:Penzance, Cornwall
Yep it does look good that low but messing around with ride hight's is not as simple as it my seem, without work to the inner arches and chassis I dont think this ride hight is achievable.

So I think if you have got 2" drop spindles then some stock ride hight springs should then give a 2" drop but will keep the steering geometry correct and so improve the handling and stop odd tyre ware, I think at best you will end up with the top of the tyre level with the bottom of the wing.

If I remember today I'll measure my swivels to see if they are the same as yours as I know mine are standard.

How have they lowered the rear, with blocks between the axle and spring?


Top
   
PostPosted:Wed Nov 20, 2013 10:12 am 
Offline
Big Block
User avatar

Joined:Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:41 am
Posts:827
Car Details:1968 Camaro Racing Car "Butch"
1968 Camaro Convertible 327"Camilla"
1979 AMC CJ7 Jeep 360V8
1980 BMW E21 Alpina B6 2.8
1991 BMW E30 HartgeH26
1958 as yet unrevealed sportsracer with chevV8
Location:Isle of Man and Inverness
I agree that your springs look way too short

in picture 2 above you can see the angle of the bottom wishbone is NOT level with the ground- look at the angle of the anti roll bar straining against the pivot!

I reckon you need std BB springs

I used Hotckiss to good effect- made Camilla sit higher but much more useable- I might have some springs knocking about.....................

_________________
Kind Regards
TopCat
Secretary
Classic Camaro Club
Member of The Association of American Car Clubs UK
Email :tboles@strathnoon.co.uk Websites: http://www.classiccamaroclubuk.com and:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdhLJtR_ZY4


Top
   
PostPosted:Wed Nov 20, 2013 1:03 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:36 pm
Posts:81
Car Details:1969 Chevrolet Camaro
The rear has 2" drop leaf springs I think, not blocks ill have another look before ordering parts

All I know is from the email from the shop that built it, its had a 2" drop all round and full cpp big block suspension kit up front,

At stock height should the car sit level? Or lower at the front like mine?


Top
   
PostPosted:Wed Nov 20, 2013 6:14 pm 
Offline
Big Block

Joined:Sun Jun 02, 2013 7:20 pm
Posts:160
Car Details:80 T/A with a BBC
79 Z28
68 Firebird F 400
67 Firebird Convertible
Location:Penzance, Cornwall
OK the swivels are 7" from top face to bottom and the centre of the stub axle is 1 1/2" up from the bottom of the swivel, so looking at yours they look standard.

Next your disc's are not standard, they sit more inboard than normal so your can't use longer lower ball joints.

The distance from the base of the chassis to the lower control are is 4" on my car and with a 25.5" dia tyre on a 15" by 9" rim with a 4" back space there is just enough room for it not to touch the inner arch, the control arm is sat a little high at the inner/bolt end at 9.5" and the outer?ball joint end at 9" so I think I need a lower profile tyre to get the measurements the same for me.

And another measurement I took was the distance between the top of the tyre and the fender which was 1.5" between the two.


Top
   
Display posts from previous: Sort by 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [14 posts ]  Go to page12Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited